Current:Home > InvestJudge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children -Wealth Evolution Experts
Judge won’t block North Dakota’s ban on gender-affirming care for children
View
Date:2025-04-16 06:06:31
BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A North Dakota law banning gender-affirming care for children will continue to be enforced pending a court challenge, but any kids whose treatments began before the law took effect in April 2023 can keep getting the care, according to a judge’s ruling released Wednesday.
Judge Jackson Lofgren denied a preliminary injunction sought by families seeking to overturn the law, as he had previously done in November when the plaintiffs sought a temporary restraining order.
The plaintiffs said a grandfather clause in the law is so vague it led providers to stop treatments in the state, but the judge made clear those minors can continue any medical care they had before the law took effect.
It isn’t clear that the plaintiffs are “substantially” likely to win their case, now scheduled for a November trial, on claims that the law violates rights to parent or to personal autonomy and self-determination, the judge said.
He also sided against claims that the grandfather clause is unconstitutionally vague, and that the plaintiffs have shown irreparable harm. With the current law in effect for more than a year now, Lofgren said “the public interest in maintaining the status quo weighs against granting a preliminary injunction.”
The law took immediate effect when Republican Gov. Doug Burgum signed it in April 2023 after overwhelming approval by the GOP-controlled legislature. It makes it a misdemeanor for a health care provider to prescribe or give hormone treatments or puberty blockers to a transgender child, and a felony to perform gender-affirming surgery on a minor.
“The longer this law is allowed to remain in effect, the more North Dakota kids and families will be harmed by the state’s unfair, unjust, and unconstitutional denial of the essential and life-saving health care they need,” Gender Justice Senior Staff Attorney Brittany Stewart, who represents the families and a doctor challenging the ban.
Republican state Rep. Bill Tveit, who brought the bill, was pleased with the ruling. He said the law protects children from irreversible procedures.
Opponents said the ban will harm transgender kids who face greater risks of depression, self-harm and suicide, and stressed that no one performs such surgeries in the state.
Despite the exception for children who were receiving treatments before the ban took effect, providers have considered the grandfather clause too vague to risk it, so the plaintiff families have had to travel out of state to get gender-affirming care for their children, Gender Justice said.
The judge disagreed, writing that such children “can receive any gender-affirming care they could have received in North Dakota prior to the Health Care Law’s enactment.”
Gender Justice agreed that the clarification “paves the way for providers to resume care for these patients in North Dakota.”
“However, significant barriers to access will remain for most or all children and families seeking care in North Dakota, as doctors who stopped providing care to transgender youth may hesitate to resume care due to concerns over the serious legal threats posed by the law,” the organization’s statement said.
Twenty-five states have adopted bans on gender-affirming care for minors in the past few years, nearly all of them challenged in court. Arkansas is appealing after a court struck down its ban entirely. Courts blocked enforcement of the law in Montana. And the ACLU has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review whether the bans should remain in effect in Kentucky and Tennessee. The high court has allowed the Idaho law to remain in effect while lawsuits proceed.
___
AP writer Geoff Mulvihill contributed to this report from Cherry Hill, New Jersey.
For more AP coverage of LGBTQ+ issues: https://apnews.com/hub/lgbtq-legislation
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee announces pancreatic cancer diagnosis
- Hot air balloon crash leaves 3 injured in Indiana; federal investigation underway
- Poppi sodas 'are basically sugared water' due to low prebiotic fiber content, lawsuit says
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- MLB bans Tucupita Marcano for life for betting on baseball, four others get one-year suspensions
- Sally Buzbee, executive editor of The Washington Post, steps down in 'abrupt shake-up'
- Does Miley Cyrus Want Kids? She Says...
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Taylor Swift's Sweet Onstage Reaction to Football Lyric Amid Travis Kelce Romance Will Feel Like Flying
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Felicity Actor Erich Anderson Dead at 67 After Private Cancer Battle
- Novak Djokovic wins his record 370th Slam match but isn’t sure he can continue at the French Open
- New Orleans valedictorian lived in a homeless shelter as he rose to the top of his class
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Chinese spacecraft lands on far side of moon
- Map shows states affected by recalled cucumbers potentially contaminated with salmonella
- Hailey Bieber Shares Timeline Update on Her Pregnancy
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
A judge will mull whether an Arizona border rancher can face a new murder trial after dismissal
Larry Allen, former Dallas Cowboys great and Pro Football Hall of Famer, dies at 52
Travis Kelce's Pal Weighs in on Potential Taylor Swift Wedding
What to watch: O Jolie night
Florida Panthers, Edmonton Oilers facing off in Stanley Cup Final. What to know
Why are America's youth so deeply unhappy? | The Excerpt
Demi Lovato Details Finding the “Light Again” After 5 In-Patient Mental Health Treatments