Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Wealth Evolution Experts
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-17 02:34:07
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (12)
Related
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Is Ben Affleck Dating Kick Kennedy Amid Jennifer Lopez Divorce? Here's the Truth
- Nick Chubb to remain on Browns' PUP list to continue rehab from devastating knee injury
- Pregnant Margot Robbie Puts Baby Bump on Display During Vacation With Tom Ackerley
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Man charged with making online threats to kill election officials in Colorado and Arizona
- Jenna Ortega Slams “Insane” Johnny Depp Dating Rumors
- Salmon will soon swim freely in the Klamath River for first time in a century once dams are removed
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Salmon will soon swim freely in the Klamath River for first time in a century once dams are removed
Ranking
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- US appeals court clears way for Florida ban on transgender care for minors
- The price of happiness? $200,000, according to one recent survey
- West Virginia middle school student dies after sustaining injury during football practice
- Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
- Erika Jayne's Ex Tom Girardi Found Guilty on 4 Counts of Wire Fraud
- Ben Affleck's Rep Addresses Kick Kennedy Dating Rumors Amid Jennifer Lopez Divorce
- Inadequate inspections and lack of oversight cited in West Virginia fatal helicopter crash
Recommendation
NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
Karen Read now faces civil suit as well as murder charge in police officer boyfriend’s death
Democrats sue to block Georgia rules that they warn will block finalization of election results
Kelly Monaco Leaving General Hospital After 21 Years
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Robert Griffin III: 'Just really thankful' for time at ESPN after firing
Lily Allen Responds to Backlash After Giving Up Puppy for Eating Her Passport
Republicans want voters to think Tim Walz lied about his dog. Such claims could cause real damage