Current:Home > NewsHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases -Wealth Evolution Experts
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View
Date:2025-04-15 17:16:23
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Man gets 226-year prison sentences for killing 2 Alaska Native women. He filmed the torture of one
- Moms swoon over new 'toddler Stanleys.' But the cups have been around for years.
- Why Gilmore Girls' Keiko Agena Has Always Been Team Jess in Rory's Best Boyfriend Debate
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Houston community groups strain to keep feeding and cooling a city battered by repeat storms
- Blind woman says Uber driver left her stranded at wrong location in North Carolina
- US Transportation Department to invest nearly $400 million for new Interstate 55 bridge in Memphis
- Nearly half of US teens are online ‘constantly,’ Pew report finds
- Shop Incredible Revolve Flash Deals: $138 House of Harlow Dress for $28, $22 Jennifer Lopez Shoes & More
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Cover star. All-Star. Superstar. A'ja Wilson needs to be an even bigger household name.
- How many points did Bronny James score tonight? Lakers-Rockets summer league box score
- Dolly Parton gives inside look at new Dollywood attraction, shares why it makes her so emotional
- Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
- Gang used drugs, violence to commit robberies that led to four deaths, prosecutors say
- Channing Tatum Reveals the Sweet Treat Pal Taylor Swift Made for Him
- American tourist dead after suddenly getting sick on Sicily's Mount Etna, rescuers say
Recommendation
Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
10 billion passwords have been leaked on a hacker site. Are you at risk?
U.S. says it will deploy more long-range missiles in Germany, Russia vows a military response
Following Cancer Alley Decision, States Pit Themselves Against Environmental Justice Efforts
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Alabama agrees to forgo autopsy of Muslin inmate scheduled to be executed next week
Retired Massachusetts pediatrician pleads not guilty to abusing young patients
After embrace at NATO summit, Zelenskyy takes his case for US military aid to governors